Skip to content

INTERVIEW. Retirement at 55 for employees, 65 for executives: a deputy’s proposal

Ought to employees and workers be allowed to retire earlier than executives? This proposal, which contrasts with the federal government’s challenge, comes from a word from the Jean-Jaurès Basis, co-signed by Louis-Samuel Pilcer, lecturer in economics at Sciences Po, Vincent Verbavatz, engineer from Bridges, Waters and Forests, Riwan Yahmi, affiliate professor of economics and administration, in addition to Philippe Brun, PS deputy for Eure.

The latter agreed to reply questions fromWest France and element their proposal.

PS MP Philippe Brun on the Nationwide Meeting, November 8, 2022. | THOMAS SAMSON / AFP

You plan a retirement at 55 for employees and workers however at 65 for executives, why?

The commentary is that the richest French folks stay longer on common. The distinction is 13 years for males and eight years for ladies. A 35-year-old man is twice as prone to die earlier than age 60 if he’s a employee than if he’s a supervisor.

To reply this, we’ve determined to deliver into the controversy the query of a differentiated beginning age with the concept that one ought to depart earlier when one has a tough job.

Learn additionally: Pension reform: is 2×8 work thought of painful?

Is the dimensions of socio-professional classes related? For instance, amongst workers, there could also be very variable working circumstances…

If there was selection, we would not have such stark numbers. Right now, 94% of occupational ailments detected are amongst workers and employees. Nonetheless, hardship is just barely taken under consideration by the pension system. As well as, employees and workers have probably the most tough jobs however are additionally those that are most affected by unemployment amongst seniors.

The retirement of an govt prices two and a half instances greater than that of an worker.

Is such a proposal real looking financially? Does not it threat unbalancing the pension system?

What we’re proposing is to make the employees and workers depart earlier and to finance it by making the executives depart later. For the 12 billion euros that we should discover for the steadiness of the system, we’ve different proposals such because the contribution of capital taxation with the tax on superprofits. After which, there’s a actual topic on those that don’t work and subsequently don’t contribute.

The truth is, executives typically begin their profession later and subsequently already depart round 65?

Sure, it already occurs. However financially elevating the authorized age to 65 for executives would decrease the authorized age to 55 for employees. Certainly, the retirement of an govt prices two and a half instances costlier than that of an worker.

Learn additionally: What influence will the pension reform have in your departure date?

Is not the danger with this proposal to enter into an à la carte pension system?

The concept of ​​this word was first to make folks react and to place the topic on the desk. Furthermore, maybe the true topic just isn’t that of a authorized age however of quarters differentiated in line with professions. There usually are not executives on one aspect and employees on the opposite. In his life, one might have been a employee after which develop into an govt.

Past the authorized age, what is actually wanted is to earn extra quarters when you may have been a employee and subsequently be capable to retire earlier. Conversely, some senior executives, who occupy professions with out bodily hardship, don’t wish to retire. That is, for instance, the case of prefects who’re restricted to 67 years however who continuously ask for exemptions to proceed working.

We now have to discover a steadiness as a way to put an finish to this inequality within the face of loss of life, which is unacceptable.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *