Skip to content

Combat towards quick trend. Eight proposals to remodel the style business at European stage

The brand new financial mannequin of the textile and clothes business, following the disintegration of the European industrial sector, has led to an ultra-dependence of European nations vis-à-vis producing nations in Asia. This business is just not solely disregarding the safety of human rights but in addition very dangerous to the atmosphere. What can Europe do in human, environmental, well being and financial phrases? Fanny Hervo attracts up a listing and suggests methods to essentially combat towards the harm attributable to quick trend.

Contents

Introduction

Human safety within the trend business
Combat towards pressured labor
Transfer in the direction of respectable pay and social rights

Environmental and well being safety within the trend business
Supervision of a polluting and water-intensive business
In direction of a greater framework for the toxicity of merchandise within the textile business
In direction of reciprocity of European import requirements: the implementation of mirror measures?

Results of quick trend on the style business in Europe
On the European Union’s interdependence in trend
In direction of a crucial evolution of trend consumption patterns in Europe?

Suggestions

Conclusion

Annex. Interview with Raphaël Glucksmann

Some key figures

The world manufacturing of the textile and clothes business has doubled between 2000 and 2015. It’s anticipated to extend by 63% by 2030. European manufacturing has in the meantime stagnatedwith a continued improve in imports from Asia.

Whereas the European textile sector employed 1.5 million folks in 2020, almost 13 million employees worldwide thus produced the amount of clothes consumed within the European Union.

Yearly, within the European Union, 4 million tons of textiles are thrown away. Europeans purchase on common 26 kg of garments per 12 months and throw 11 kg. Disposal of wearables represents 460 billion {dollars} annually.

The worth of clothes has fallen by 30% between 1996 and 2008.

The second hand has tripled since 2020 and represents between 3 and 5% of the sector in 2022.

Synthesis

Lately, the style business has been steadily talked about. Between mass internment of Uyghurs, deadly manufacturing unit collapses or plethoric improve within the carbon footprint – 3.3 billion tonnes of CO2 being issued yearly – an entire financial mannequin must be rethought.

To rethink to guard those that work there, on the one hand. The style business steadily flouts elementary and worldwide rights, notably through the use of pressured labor to make sure the excessive charge of manufacturing. A apply with devastating penalties for the employees who’re pressured into it and towards which the European Union intends to combat, through specifically the proposal to ban merchandise constituted of pressured labor on the Group market. Nevertheless, this proposal have to be examined and voted on by the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union to enter into power. Additionally it is attainable to combat towards this apply through the institution of respectable social rights, by each higher working situations and higher pay.

An business to rethink in that it’s dangerous to the atmosphere, however. Along with the toxicity of the merchandise of the textile business – there are in actual fact some 20,000 completely different chemical substances in clothes – the latter is a big shopper of water and is extremely polluting. Round economic system, new necessities when it comes to eco-design of clothes or prohibition of the destruction of unsold gadgets are the avenues to be explored to restrict the environmental harm of trend.

If this report invitations us to consider methods to mitigate the environmental penalties of quick trend, it additionally opens up new methods of fascinated with clothes. This occurs specifically through elevated management by the European Union, whose textile sector has been badly shaken by relocations and the lack of expert labour. Revitalizing the sector would enable manufacturing in Europe. As well as, an evolution of practices is to be imagined: second hand, empowerment of shoppers, institution of a European Nutriscore or combat towards greenwashing are some avenues to discover.

Suggestions

Export European requirements and values ​​to guard folks

  • Prolong the scope of software of the responsibility of vigilance of firms and guarantee efficient monitoring and management of the appliance of the measures in power
  • Require that social audit companies within the textile business publish audit studies on dangers and incidents associated to security and employees’ rights

Selling a sustainable European industrial mannequin by preventing towards unfair competitors

  • Transfer in the direction of the implementation of mirror measures or mirror clauses on imports
  • Enhance European funding for small and medium-sized enterprises within the textile business through a devoted program
  • Promote coaching within the textile business (Erasmus +)
  • Set up a agency ban on the destruction of unsold items

Strengthening the ability of the European shopper

  • Arrange a European “Nutriscore” for the textile and clothes business sector
  • Tighten EU labeling laws (prolonged to on-line gross sales)

The creator:
Fanny Hervo is an knowledgeable related to the Jean-Jaurès Basis. A lawyer by coaching, she specialised in European public insurance policies after an expertise within the European Parliament. Previously chargeable for advocacy on the European Motion-France, she is now a public affairs guide with a robust curiosity in environmental insurance policies.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *